
In the aftermath of a covered loss such as a hurricane, a burst pipe, or a kitchen fire, Florida policyholders are often surprised to learn that the adjuster who first walks through their property works for the insurance company. That adjuster's obligation runs to the carrier, not to the homeowner. Florida law addresses this imbalance through the public adjuster system, and after decades of practicing in this area, I still find that most clients have only a vague sense of how it operates, if they even know it exists. This post lays out the mechanics: who public adjusters are, how they're regulated, what they can charge, and what happens when their assessment of a claim collides with the insurance company's.
A public adjuster is a licensed professional retained by the policyholder to inspect the loss, prepare the claim, and negotiate directly with the carrier's adjuster. The role exists to balance the process. Where a company adjuster is trained to control exposure for the insurer, a public adjuster's job is to make sure the full extent of a covered loss is documented and priced accurately.
In practice, that work involves inspecting the property, reviewing the policy language to identify every avenue of coverage, building a line-item estimate of repair and replacement costs, and then carrying the negotiation with the carrier through to settlement. It is, at bottom, an advocacy role. The public adjuster is the policyholder's representative in a process that would otherwise be entirely one-sided.
Public adjusters are not self-appointed. They are licensed by the Florida Department of Financial Services, and the requirements to obtain that license are not trivial: pre-licensing coursework, a state examination, a background check, and proof of errors-and-omissions coverage. Once licensed, their conduct is governed by Florida Statute. Section 626.854 which sets out permissible practices, contract requirements, and several provisions specifically aimed at protecting policyholders from abusive arrangements.
Anyone hiring a public adjuster should confirm the license is active and in good standing. DFS maintains a searchable license database, and it is worth five minutes of anyone's time before signing a contract.
Florida law does not leave public adjuster fees to the market. Section 626.854 caps them, and the caps depend on the nature of the loss:
Ten percent of the claim payment for losses arising from an event that triggered a declared state of emergency -- a hurricane, most commonly -- for claims made within one year of that declaration. Twenty percent of the payment for all other property claims.
Two points of the statute tend to be misunderstood. First, the percentage is applied to what the carrier pays, not to whatever figure was initially claimed. A public adjuster who negotiates an $80,000 payout on a twenty-percent contract earns $16,000, regardless of the original demand. Second, the deductible is excluded from that calculation entirely. The fee cannot be assessed against the portion of the loss the homeowner is bearing.
A contract that exceeds these caps is not simply inadvisable; it is unenforceable as written. If a proposed engagement letter names a percentage above the statutory limit, that alone should end the conversation.
The process tends to follow a predictable sequence, though the timeline varies considerably with the complexity of the loss.
The engagement begins with a review of the policy and an inspection of the damage, followed by a written contract specifying the fee. From there, the public adjuster documents the loss, photographs, moisture readings, code compliance issues, and any secondary damage, such as mold following water intrusion, that a less thorough inspection might miss. That documentation supports a detailed estimate, prepared using the same estimating software the insurance industry relies on, which is then submitted to the carrier along with the claim.
What follows is negotiation, sometimes brief and sometimes protracted. The public adjuster corresponds with the carrier's adjuster, responds to requests for additional documentation, and pushes back on valuations that undersell the loss. When the parties reach agreement, the carrier issues payment, and the public adjuster's fee is deducted from those proceeds.
Disagreement between a public adjuster and the carrier's adjuster is not an aberration -- it is close to the default situation in any contested claim. Nearly every case involves some dispute over the scope of damage, the cost of repair, or how a particular policy provision applies. How that disagreement gets resolved depends on what, exactly, is in dispute.
Continued negotiation resolves many of these disagreements. A carrier's initial offer is rarely its final position, and a public adjuster who returns with additional support such as contractor estimates, engineering reports, documentation of code-upgrade requirements, etc., will often move the number without further escalation.
Appraisal is the mechanism most Florida homeowners’ policies build in for disputes that don't resolve through negotiation. It is worth understanding its limits: appraisal addresses the amount of a covered loss, not whether the loss is covered in the first place. Under the appraisal clause, each side selects its own appraiser, those two appraisers select a neutral umpire, and a decision joined by the umpire and at least one appraiser becomes binding on the amount of loss. It is generally faster and less expensive than litigation, but it is not a vehicle for resolving coverage disputes, only valuation disputes.
Mediation is also available for many residential property claims through a program administered by the Department of Financial Services. It puts both sides in front of a neutral third party to reach resolution short of appraisal or litigation. It tends to be the least adversarial of the available options, though its usefulness depends heavily on the facts of the claim.
Coverage disputes and bad faith sit in a different category altogether. When the disagreement isn't about dollars but about whether the loss is covered at all, or when a carrier is unreasonably delaying, underpaying, or failing to investigate a claim in good faith, that is no longer something a public adjuster is positioned to resolve. This is the point at which the matter typically moves to counsel. A property insurance attorney can pursue litigation on the coverage question, and where the facts support it, a statutory bad-faith claim against the carrier.